By Sara Huebener
This morning my father and I got in a lively debate. It's something that invariably ends up happening after our small talk about the kids and Easter plans are over. And while we usually end up debating topics like health care, welfare, the outsourcing of jobs overseas, the dealth penalty and political issues, today's debate turned to banks and real estate.
Somewhere in the discussion, we got into the details of some of the actions banks are undertaking to dot i's and cross t's. I have seen lenders check a buyer's employment the day before closing. I have seen a lender ask for documentation from the parent of an adult borrower, asking the parent to issue a written statement for why a check for $76.23 was deposited into the borrower's checking account (the buyer did some grocery shopping for his mom and she wrote him a check to reimburse him for the amount, which he deposited in his checking account.)
We talked about the catch-22 involved in this process. I told my dad something to the effect of, "Banks are doing their due diligence, and at the same time are making it harder to sell real estate." His reply of "Well, they got burned" was a perfect segue into my next statement of observation: We all know that foreclosures are priced to move. Banks do not want to hold onto these properties any longer than necessary. But we are seeing some foreclosures hit our market that are easily priced $50,000 BELOW what would be an expected and significant discount for a distressed property.
Case in point: This weekend I took a family out looking for homes. One of the homes on our list was a foreclosure here in Savage. When it hit the market, I notified my buyers, saying the house was priced far lower than it's value. The house had almost 3000 sqft and was full of maple and built-ins. It was priced in the range of a townhouse.
Coincidentally, an open house was scheduled at the time of our planned showing. When we got to the house Saturday morning, the agent was 20 minutes late for the open house, and the cars were lined all the way up and down the street. It was a spectacle. Clearly, this house was so severely undervalued, that I questioned whether the bank holding this asset is even aware that this home was priced at $50,000 below (a discounted) market value.
I told my dad that if the bank knowingly was dropping the value so low, all their due diligence being passed on current borrowers in cross-checking minor bank account deposits was counter-productive. Why inquire about such minute charges as a $75 checking account deposit of a qualified buyer, when valuable homes are being fire-sold at market? Of course, this conversation then morphed into who is managing these assets, and I will end my comments here.
All told, it was an interesting discussion. Banks need to cross check borrowers for credit worthiness. But are (some) banks aware of the pricing strategies going on in our market? Not all foreclosures are priced to drop the value out of a neighborhood. But this one definitely was. And if a bank really wants to "dump" a property, in this case, for example, they could have asked for tens of thousands of dollars more, and still had it promptly taken off the books.